BENCHMARK WINNER: Blazing
Performance: 9/10 wins (90% success rate)
Executive Summary
This comprehensive benchmark evaluated three leading Solana trading platforms across 10 rounds of 0.001 SOL trades. The analysis focuses on blockchain landing performance - the actual order transactions appear on the Solana blockchain.
Key Findings:
Blazing achieved superior performance with 9 blockchain wins (90%)
0 rounds required same-slot scenario analysis using block position data
All platforms maintained 100% transaction success rate with zero failures
Block position analysis provided accurate winner determination for same-slot scenarios
Detailed Round-by-Round Analysis
Round 1 Results:
Slot Numbers: Blazing: 354176080, Jupiter: 354176083, GMGN: 354176084
Transaction Hashes:
Blazing: 4ByGihRQTYjp...AvePAV6w3DEW
Jupiter: 2wEjYB5KeV6C...E5RhjmvR58Si
GMGN: 3y6SKrnrRYpb...NGjkbc8cMKPR
Round 2 Results:
• Winner: Blazing
• Second Place: GMGN
• Third Place: Jupiter
• Slot Numbers:
Transaction Hashes:
Blazing: 58ukmtx3mVqr...EAwFKG5qdb2j
Jupiter: 3r7wLLA6hTSg...fHMwcRE6xu1x
GMGN: 2YnuyUqnS8h3...n9uGFoYLVqNR
Round 3 Results:
• Winner: Jupiter
• Second Place: Blazing
• Third Place: GMGN
• Slot Numbers:
Transaction Hashes:
Blazing: 39hpcMEVCyZ2...GzNTUqKqWiP2
Jupiter: 5rSAJEdw9L4G...jjHWhAdSgt36
GMGN: 3nrfpsYG18yE...GXyi1TpzGJ99
Same-Slot Analysis:
Slot 354176116 — Jupiter → Blazing → GMGN
Round 4 Results:
• Winner: Blazing
• Second Place: GMGN
• Third Place: Jupiter
Slot Numbers:
Transaction Hashes:
Blazing: 2ZB9JMUsGQBw...ptXm3X8u7CLe
Jupiter: 3k7gktcqZjQy...mW8zSL1hFYyL
GMGN: 4T3MkPb2rTyg...dSmSCzLMBf2E
Round 5 Results:
• Winner: Blazing
• Second Place: Jupiter
• Third Place: GMGN
• Slot Numbers:
Transaction Hashes:
Blazing: 5n5R3HSmSkq5...TuGUXAWiDE7D
Jupiter: PtgqpPKpEfjK...nxvScEQsFv1c
GMGN: 4o6aDnZzS5uh...Aa2gZ9Jkp8nu
Same-Slot Analysis:
Slot 354176176 - Jupiter → GMGN
Round 6 Results:
• Winner: Blazing
• Second Place: GMGN
• Third Place: Jupiter
Slot Numbers:
Transaction Hashes:
Blazing: 5vww3UTuVRdM...RBW2DT75Dbyj
Jupiter: 3fEzuBHfqfMj...feAR6qqH4RHE
GMGN: 28Xh8pVpDSCk...jjK44KrCdKt9
Round 7 Results:
• Winner: Blazing
• Second Place: GMGN
• Third Place: Jupiter
Slot Numbers:
Transaction Hashes:
Blazing: 2bEZLorjdhhH...BBuHZ4Wizxut
Jupiter: 649hsJ5gRqz6...eY8jBXGzySFo
GMGN: Mj8r4sdDMYwP...VLYyp5AqS8Xt
Same-Slot Analysis: Slot 354176246 - Blazing → GMGN
Round 8 Results:
Slot Numbers:
Transaction Hashes:
Blazing: 2oPPyoQsyYiT...BA8aE9j65Uoa
Jupiter: 2mNreMfaNnA5...bqNwueMeXHY9
GMGN: 4Z4qU6bcd5a3...k5GrFKBR9rag
Round 9 Results:
• Winner: Blazing
• Second Place: GMGN
• Third Place: Jupiter
Slot Numbers:
Transaction Hashes:
Blazing: nyAj1JuvXih8...yjaEE37451Ve
Jupiter: 37VXzR1BvFcj...RNJTESb2Y3Hv
GMGN: 5GqS9cTi1xS3...dqE9555k4trL
Same-Slot Analysis:
Slot 354176314 - Blazing → GMGN
Round 10 Results:
• Winner: Blazing
• Second Place: GMGN
• Third Place: Jupiter
Slot Numbers:
Transaction Hashes:
Blazing: 22PcyiJeeoqz...YXJToKJKvRPd
Jupiter: 5pKi9pkvEjqp...VkGq4ueUxF1o
GMGN: 4zhPiDkhbobC...QFFKErgDW4Ad
Overall Performance Rankings:
Blockchain Wins: 9/10 (90%)
Blockchain Wins: 1/10 (10%)
Blockchain Wins: 0/10 (0%)
Same-Slot Scenario Analysis
Block Position Methodology:
When multiple transactions are confirmed within the same Solana slot, the winner is determined by analyzing their exact position within that block. Our analysis utilizes the Helius API to fetch block data and determine the canonical transaction order.
Same-Slot Scenarios Identified:
• Round 3, Slot 354176116: Jupiter → Blazing → GMGN
• Round 5, Slot 354176176: Jupiter → GMGN
• Round 7, Slot 354176246: Blazing → GMGN
• Round 9, Slot 354176314: Blazing → GMGN
Methodology
Blockchain Winner Determination Process:
Slot Comparison: Platform with the lowest confirmed slot number is ranked first
Block Position Analysis (same slot): Exact transaction order within the block determined using Helius API
Blockchain Ranking: Final ranking based on confirmed blockchain landing order
Block Position Analysis Methodology:
When multiple platforms confirm transactions within the same slot, we utilize the Helius API to fetch comprehensive block data and determine the exact transaction order. This methodology provides the most accurate determination of which transaction was confirmed first on the blockchain, ensuring precise performance measurement.
Testing Parameters:
• Trade Amount: 0.001 SOL per transaction
• Test Rounds: 10 comprehensive rounds
• Success Rate Measurement: 100% transaction confirmation required
• Block Position Verification: Helius API integration for same-slot scenarios
• Token Tested: 5v2wpT6fA97hTeHXwX4oDzoFog344ShBYrf2zWivpump
Conclusion
This comprehensive benchmark reveals that Blazing consistently outperforms competitors in blockchain landing speed, winning 9 out of 10 rounds (90% win rate).
Key Insights:
• Blazing demonstrates superior blockchain landing performance with consistent first-place finishes
• Block position analysis provides accurate same-slot winner determination when multiple transactions confirm in the same slot
• All platforms maintain 100% reliability with zero transaction failures
• Performance differences are measurable and consistent across all 10 benchmark rounds
• Same-slot scenarios demonstrate the importance of precise block position analysis for accurate performance measurement
Recommendation:
For applications requiring optimal blockchain landing speed and consistent performance, Blazing is the recommended choice based on this comprehensive analysis. The platform's superior blockchain landing performance makes it ideal for time-sensitive trading applications where transaction confirmation order is critical.